Showing posts with label traditionalists statement soteriology theology calvinism 5-points offense apology TULIP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traditionalists statement soteriology theology calvinism 5-points offense apology TULIP. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Why I Am Offended By The Statement


I am offended by the recent “Traditionalist” statement on soteriology, not because I have a few differences theologically but because some people were labeled, accused, and judged, and I’m afraid I’m part of that group. And that is disconcerting at least.

The Statement says:
“This movement (“New Calvinism”) is committed to advancing in the churches an exclusively Calvinistic understanding of salvation, characterized by an aggressive insistence on the “Doctrines of Grace” (“TULIP”), and to the goal of making Calvinism the central Southern Baptist position on God’s plan of salvation.”

    Who are these “New Calvinists”? Am I one because I affirm 5 points. I’m not actually a “TULIP” guy anyway, and neither are most Calvinist leaning Bapstists I know. I’m more of a RUDEP guy myself. But this vague accusation opens up many of us for guilt by association. Even if we don’t know exactly WHO IT IS WE ARE associating with.

The Statement says:
And, to their credit, most Southern Baptist Calvinists have not demanded the adoption of their view as the standard. We would be fine if this consensus continued, but some New Calvinists seem to be pushing for a radical alteration of this long standing arrangement.

Once again, WHO? You know what this sounds like?
“To their credit most Calvinists have enough sense to “stay in their place,” But some of these uppity New Calvinists are making us mad!”
What long standing “arrangement”? Who is rocking the boat? Am I a New Calvinist because I don’t hide my beliefs? I’m not even trying to make the church I have pastored for 13 years a “Reformed Baptist” Church. But I preach Grace and Sovereignty from the pulpit. And I preach salvation by Grace through faith and Call people to Christ.
But I also consider it a dangerous doctrine to tell people, if they say a “sinner’s prayer” and are sincere, that they are saved! Sinner’s prayers don’t save! God’s Grace saves through the demonstration of faith. Or, Faith, enabled by Grace, saves. Not a nicely worded but powerless prayer that is not expressed in miraculous, life-giving, God-given Faith!
So now am I a New Calvinist? I’m really wondering what it is that will cross the line of this “long standing arrangement” that I didn’t even know existed.
I have heard the “Traditionalist” view of Salvation all my life. I was a victim of the easy-believism it engendered. I followed suit by telling people whom I led in Sinner’s Prayers, “There, you’re saved now.” May God have mercy on me for all the people I misled into thinking they were saved, who then went about their merry sinful ways thinking they had fire insurance.
NOW, I have the audacity to tell people I was wrong –before- about salvation. That it’s not a simple matter of reciting the right words. But it is something to be sought with fear and trembling, Calling on the Name of the Lord, with faith and repentance, until such time that the Holy Spirit bears witness with our spirits that we are indeed the children of God.

I’m not trying to change the good gospel preaching of Baptists everywhere around the world or even in my own church. I believe that the “Jesus and His finished work” message being preached is the gospel that God uses as His power “unto salvation.”But I do want to warn the SBC that we have ushered in thousands upon thousands of unregenerate people into our churches with an affirmation of their salvation that we have no right to give.
That’s why I Believe the teaching that humanity is
1.       Radically Depraved- every facet of humankind has suffered under the fall. That is why every person is guilty of sin, as soon as they are morally capable they are morally culpable.
2.       Unconditional Election means that I did nothing to satisfy a “condition” for salvation. I received the salvation that Jesus secured on the cross for me!
3.       Definite Atonement means that God did not leave my salvation to chance, but definitely redeemed me by His own blood 2000 years ago.
4.       Effectual Grace teaches us that God’s grace doesn’t fail. Yes it is irresistible because it is effectual. All that the Father gives to the Son will indeed come to Him.
5.       Perseverance/Preservation of the saints, teaches that the saints will in fact persevere to the end because they are preserved by the Grace of God.
I stated these “5 Points” not to refute the tenants of the “Traditionalist’s Statement” but to go ahead and put the Bull’s Eye on my chest so people won’t miss if they are shooting at me.
Am I one of these terrible “New Calvinists” or not?  If not who are they, and why am I not one?
If it’s because I’m not trying to enforce my beliefs in the 5-points then I would suggest that’s the case of most every mature Calvinistic Baptist out there.

And just maybe, the adversarial language of the “Statement” was mis-directed or even inappropriate. And if so, I think there should be some apologies in the offing.

Below, Please see the two part reply by my friend an Brother in Christ Dr. Adam Harwood of Truett-McConnell College.